<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Tricks are Evil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donburnside.com/archive/seo-tricks-are-evil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donburnside.com/seo-tricks-are-evil/</link>
	<description>inter-media-gineering empire of Don Burnside</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: radiationman</title>
		<link>http://donburnside.com/seo-tricks-are-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-46436</link>
		<dc:creator>radiationman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windthefrog.net/?p=1116#comment-46436</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the thought is that older entries might get rank lower because of their overall age.  So not dating them might &quot;trick&quot; Google as to the age of the post and not cause it to slip in age...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However you&#039;d think that Google would have some idea as to when an item was first cataloged by one of their crawlers...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the thought is that older entries might get rank lower because of their overall age.  So not dating them might &#8220;trick&#8221; Google as to the age of the post and not cause it to slip in age&#8230;</p>

<p>However you&#8217;d think that Google would have some idea as to when an item was first cataloged by one of their crawlers&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

