<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It can always be worse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donburnside.com/archive/it-can-always-be-worse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donburnside.com/it-can-always-be-worse/</link>
	<description>inter-media-gineering empire of Don Burnside</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drill</title>
		<link>http://donburnside.com/it-can-always-be-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-15210</link>
		<dc:creator>Drill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windthefrog.net/archive/wtf/it-can-always-be-worse/#comment-15210</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m pretty ticked that Studio 60 didn&#039;t do better. IMO it&#039;s one of the smartest shows on TV, even if it does take place in L.A. :p&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty ticked that Studio 60 didn&#8217;t do better. IMO it&#8217;s one of the smartest shows on TV, even if it does take place in L.A. :p</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db</title>
		<link>http://donburnside.com/it-can-always-be-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-15058</link>
		<dc:creator>db</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 18:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windthefrog.net/archive/wtf/it-can-always-be-worse/#comment-15058</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ratings ratings ratings.  Poor placement doomed Studio 60 from the get-go I think.  This is a show that should have held the same spot as the West Wing (Thursday at 9 before ER).  There, this show could have done very well I think.  Or, at least better than it did.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ratings ratings ratings.  Poor placement doomed Studio 60 from the get-go I think.  This is a show that should have held the same spot as the West Wing (Thursday at 9 before ER).  There, this show could have done very well I think.  Or, at least better than it did.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjschaffer</title>
		<link>http://donburnside.com/it-can-always-be-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-15052</link>
		<dc:creator>pjschaffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 15:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windthefrog.net/archive/wtf/it-can-always-be-worse/#comment-15052</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I found it interesting that three of the primary actors/characters (Perry, Peet and Whitford) were not involved in the show this week.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been a Sorkin fan since &quot;Sports Night&quot; in &#039;98 and its just so frustrating when quality shows like this get cancelled.  At least Sports Night ran two seasons.  I just don&#039;t understand why Studio 60 has failed.  I&#039;ll miss it when the season is over.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Phil&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found it interesting that three of the primary actors/characters (Perry, Peet and Whitford) were not involved in the show this week.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ve been a Sorkin fan since &#8220;Sports Night&#8221; in &#8217;98 and its just so frustrating when quality shows like this get cancelled.  At least Sports Night ran two seasons.  I just don&#8217;t understand why Studio 60 has failed.  I&#8217;ll miss it when the season is over.</p>

<p>Phil</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db</title>
		<link>http://donburnside.com/it-can-always-be-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-15047</link>
		<dc:creator>db</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 14:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windthefrog.net/archive/wtf/it-can-always-be-worse/#comment-15047</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It does kind of seem that way doesn&#039;t it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s still a good show.  Maybe the next one won&#039;t be The West Wing v3.0&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does kind of seem that way doesn&#8217;t it.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s still a good show.  Maybe the next one won&#8217;t be The West Wing v3.0</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radiationman</title>
		<link>http://donburnside.com/it-can-always-be-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-15046</link>
		<dc:creator>radiationman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 14:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windthefrog.net/archive/wtf/it-can-always-be-worse/#comment-15046</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Queen and I were talking about this the other day - Does Aaron Sorkin like to write for anybody other than West Wing alums anymore?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It was a good show, but sometimes I think the circle of folks he writes for is getting smaller...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Queen and I were talking about this the other day &#8211; Does Aaron Sorkin like to write for anybody other than West Wing alums anymore?</p>

<p>It was a good show, but sometimes I think the circle of folks he writes for is getting smaller&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

